Archive

Archive for the ‘School-Based Management’ Category

School-Based Management

October 2, 2012 Comments off

Vision

- empowered schools
– proactive school heads
– innovative teachers
– engaged community stakeholders
– improved student academic performance and psycho-social growth

This is the vision of the Department of Education (DepEd) for schools in the country. This is the essence of School-Based Management (SBM), a strategy which paves the way for quality education and holistic development for our school children.

What is School-Based Management?

School-Based Management is the decentralization of decision-making authority to schools. At the school level, schools heads, teachers, and students work together with community leaders, and local government officials and other stakeholders to improve school performance.

Specifically, SBM aims to:
– empower every schools to continuously improve its performance in attaining desired outcomes for students;
– engage stakeholders in shared decision-making;
lead the school staff, together with other stakeholders in identifying and addressing school issues and concerns that affect student outcomes;
– create support network of community-based stakeholders that will mobilize social, political, cultural and economic resources; and
- make stakeholders accountable for school performance and student outcomes.

Legal Bases of SBM
The importance of SBM in improving learning outcomes has been emphasized in different legal documents and issuances.
1. The Local Government Code of the Philippines (R.A. 7160) enables communities to be more effective partners in the attainment of national goals.
2. The Medium-Term Philippine Development Plan (MTPDP 2004-2010) requires localized educational management that would enable schools to focus on enhancing initiative, creativity, innovation and effectiveness.
3. Governance of Basic Education Act (R.A. 9155) emphasizes decentralization of school governance.
4. Basic Education Sector Reform Agenda (BESRA) provides a package of policy reforms focused on Key Reform Thrusts (KRTs). KRT I deals on continuous school improvement through active involvement of stakeholders. It is anchored on the principle that those who are directly involved in and affected by school operations are in the best position to plan, manage and improve the school.
5. The Schools First Initiative (SFI) of 2004 empowers educational leaders and stakeholders to focus on school improvement and total well-being of school children.

Features of SBM
School-Based Management is enhanced management of schools. It is characterized by:

Shared Vision – It is the collective dream of major stakeholders for the school. It is the unifying and sustaining factor that upholds the values, beliefs and culture of the school community. it is the core message and establishes the principle of high performance for learners.

Shared Mission – It is the commitment to pursue necessary tasks in realizing the vision. A shared mission drives the team to undertake actions to effect planned improvements.

Shared Decision Making – it means ownership of decisions by a team of stakeholders. It is an effort to transform conventional school organizations into pro-active Learning Communities (LCs). These LCs are thus empowered to make decisions that would strengthen the teaching and learning processes.

Collaboration – it is the joint effort of stakeholders in working together toward improving learning outcomes.

Autonomy – it means stakeholders are free to govern the school as mandated by R.A. 9155, subject to a set of implementing rules and regulations of the Department of Education. Others call this decentralization.

Accountability – It is the acknowledgment and assumption of responsibility for all actions, decisions, policies, outputs and outcomes.

Community Ownership or Shared Governance – it means the forging of partnership among stakeholders to address the needs and concerns of the schools most especially those that directly affect learner’s welfare.

Transparency – it means an open presentation to stakeholders of school accountabilities such as fiscal and material resources as well as school records among others.

Six Dimensions of SBM
School-based management has six dimensions as follows:

1. School Leadership
Every school must be led by a school head. He/She is expected to provide strong, dynamic, innovative and competent leadership in promoting and sustaining quality education.

2. Internal Stakeholders
Internal stakeholders are the school heads, teachers, students and parents of students and their associations who directly work for the improvement of school performance. Their inputs about the school’s strengths, weaknesses, threats and opportunities are necessary in the agenda for school improvement.

3. External Stakeholders
External stakeholders are composed of community members, people from non-governmental organization or NGOs, and the local government officials who have a stake in the education of the children. Their participation in the strategic planning for school improvement and attainment of learning outcomes is crucial. Aside from helping generate additional resources for the formulation and implementation of the School Improvement Plan, they should also be involved in the monitoring and evaluation of learning outcomes.

4. School Improvement Process
The School Improvement Process puts in place a continuing systematic method of upgrading the delivery of educational services at the school level. It involves analysis of school needs, planning and implementing appropriate actions. It calls for a mechanism that would ensure accessibility to quality education. It also involves comparing and analyzing one’s practices with other SBM practitioners in the country.

5. Resource Management
Allocating, sourcing and managing resources is a major dimension of SBM. Resources could be human, material and financial which are necessary for school operation. With so much to do and with very limited resources, the need for resource generation, its judicious allocation and utilization is imperative. Financial resources of schools may come from the General Appropriations Fund, regular Maintenance and Other Operating Expenses (MOOE), local government allocation, Special Education Fund (SEF), community contributions, grants and other income-generating projects.

6. Performance Accountability
The school heads’ periodic reporting to stakeholders of school performance especially learning outcomes of students is crucial. Communicating the school’s real situation such as learning outcomes, financial status, issues and concerns would generate more support from the external stakeholders for the School Improvement Plan.

SBM SCALE OF PRACTICE (Click here to view Matrix)
Improved learning outcomes is the ultimate objective of school-based management. To achieve this goal, a three-scale of SBM Practice has been devised.
sbm_5.jpg

Strategies of Change in SBM
The real spirit of decentralization calls for the strengthening of the school support system through the mobilization of stakeholders. It entails school improvement planning and implementation, fund management, monitoring and evaluation, among others. Decentralization requires strengthening of stakeholders’ participation and understanding of their roles, functions, and responsibilities to carry out educational programs, projects and services for better student outcomes.

Continuous Process of Improvement
The school needs to continuously improve through assessment of its level of SBM practice along the six dimensions. Management system in schools is anchored on the framework of these six dimensions of SBM. These dimensions guide stakeholders in their commitment to support change efforts towards achieving the desired outcomes.

Progression in the scales of SBM practice is achieved as specific milestones in SBM dimensions are realized.

School Governance
This is a system which operates under the principle of shared responsibility and accountability among stakeholders. School Governance is operationalized through the organization of the School Governing Council (SGC)

The SGC creates a safe, equitable and a flexible learning environment based on the needs of the students, teachers and the community. Within the framework of SBM, the school through the SGC has the prerogative to develop learning materials and introduce learning innovations to address poor pupil performance and high dropout rate. Thus, the SGC assumes full authority, responsibility, and accountability for the education of the students.

Structures and Roles
Organizational structures provide the support mechanism to guide the implementation, monitoring and evaluation of various school programs. Both internal and external stakeholders are responsible for the successful turnout of efforts for school improvement that leads to better student outcomes.

Support System
A key to the success of SBM is the support system provided by the Department of Education, Regional, Division, and District Offices. The system facilitates an environment of trust and confidence in all schools.

All levels of the Department have important roles and functions that support the collaborative work with schools. All efforts are unified and focused on quality teaching and learning programs

The support system also addresses teachers’ needs for basic instructional equipment and materials that could make the learning environment conducive to the development of students’ full potential.

Click here to download SBM Manual

Templates:
1. Assessment Result Template
2. SBM Scoring Template
3. Division Work Plan Template

Revised SBM Assessment Tool as of August 12, 2012

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.